tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9082470.post115874688160351532..comments2024-03-28T22:51:28.222+05:30Comments on The Middle Stage: On Saul Bellow's Seize The DayChandrahashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07483080477755487202noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9082470.post-68475905118836993862009-08-08T02:12:25.836+05:302009-08-08T02:12:25.836+05:30I've just finished reading Seize the Day, and ...I've just finished reading Seize the Day, and can't really say I enjoyed it. The odd passage was beautiful, particularly Wilhelm's moment of realisation in the last few pages, but overall I found it very dull.<br /><br />Tamkin was well-portrayed as a pseudointellectual bore, but the problem was that Bellow had to resort to a lot of pseudointellectual waffle to achieve that effect! It wasn't entertaining, nor was it thought-provoking. Very few of the 'philosophical' or 'spiritual' ideas struck me as being very original or insightful.<br /><br />Some characters were more interesting (Wilhelm, Dr Adler, Mr Perls), and the setting was skilfully evoked; but it had the plot of a short story, not a novella.<br /><br />I much preferred the other Bellow novel that I have tackled: The Adventures of Augie March. I suspect that Seize the Day is one of those books that has benefited from being an 'accessible' introduction to an otherwise rather inaccessible author. In fact, Seize the Day was, despite its brevity, a tougher read for me than Augie March -- which comes highly recommended.AndyWnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9082470.post-24034676164822078362007-09-19T02:33:00.000+05:302007-09-19T02:33:00.000+05:30The "Dr. Tamkin" character in "Seize the Day" does...The "Dr. Tamkin" character in "Seize the Day" does a lot of talking (in the midst of an otherwise rather mercenary capitalist environment in which Tommy finds himself) about what one might call core spiritual issues, even Vedantic issues. It's part of what makes the book so interesting, if ambiguous, because Tommy never really fully believes anything that Tamkin says, but is his skepticism because he is too spiritually burned out to be receptive? Or because he's not really open to anything new, emotionally or spiritually, because he is so oppressed? Or is Tamkin just a smoothtalking fraud? <BR/><BR/> I sense that Bellow was careful to never have Tamkin say or do anything that the reader knows to be misleading or a lie (and in fact makes an effort to confirm a couple of Tamkin's stories), but neither does he allow Tommy to trust that what Tamkin is telling him might help "save" him from the misery of his existence. As readers we see plenty of evidence that what Tamkin is telling Tommy is true. But we can't be sure. Certainly nothing we observe (or Tommy observes) contradicts Tamkin's claims or stories, and yet they go so against the commonplace myth of money = freedom that Tommy can't trust it.<BR/><BR/>Another great passage:<BR/><BR/>-----------<BR/>That sick Mr. Perls at breakfast had said that there was no easy way to tell the sane from the mad, and he was right about that in any big city and especially in New York -- the end of the world, with its complexity and machinery, bricks and tubes, wires and stones, holes and heights. And was everybody crazy here? What sort of people did you see? Every other man spoke a language entirely his own, which he had figured out by private thinking' he had his own ideas and peculiar ways. If you wanted to talk about a glass of water, you had to start back with God creating the heavens and earth; the apple; Abraham; Moses and Jesus; Rome; the Middle Ages; gunpowder; the Revolution; back to Newton; up to Einstein; then war and Lenin and Hitler. After reviewing this and getting it all straight again you could proceed to talk about a glass of water. "I'm fainting, please get me a little water." You were lucky even then to make yourself understood. And this happened over and over and over with everyone you met. You had to translate and translate, explain and explain, back and forth, and it was the punishment of hell itself not to understand or be understood, not to know the crazy from the sane, the wise from the fools, the young from the old or the sick from the well. The fathers were no fathers and the songs no songs. You had to talk with yourself in the daytime and reason with yourself at night. Who else was there to talk to in a city like New York?<BR/><BR/>A queer look came over Wilhelm's face with its eyes turned up and his silent mouth with its high upper lip. He went several degrees further -- when you are like this, dreaming that everybody is outcast, you realize that this must be one of the small matters. There is a larger body, and from this you cannot be separated. The glass of water fades out. You do not go from simple A and simple B to the great X and Y, nor does it matter whether you agree about the glass but, far beneath such details, what Tamkin would call the real soul says plain and understandable things to everyone. There sons and fathers are themselves, and a glass of water is only an ornament; it makes of hoop of brightness on the cloth*; it is an angel's mouth. There truth for everybody may be found, and confusion is only -- temporary, thought Wilhelm.<BR/>-------------------------<BR/><BR/>I live in New York, and some of these observations still ring true. I think I tend to interpret "Seize the Day" as rather a spiritually-oriented book, but at the same time Bellow leaves much ambiguous or inconclusive, especially the end of the story. This is part of what makes it fascinating, since, just like life, you can't find an empirical way to believe in something better than you are finding around you. But most human beings need to find that connective something nevertheless, even if it cannot be measured or proven.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9082470.post-18752005903356982692007-06-30T08:54:00.000+05:302007-06-30T08:54:00.000+05:30Anirudh- That's okay, I've got all the Bellow nove...Anirudh- That's okay, I've got all the Bellow novels I want now from old bookshops. I find I am not <I>such</I> a big fan of his work. Oftentimes I find his fabled energy merely dull. As with Rushdie, I sometimes prefer his essays to his fiction. A collection of his called <I>It All Adds Up</I> has several very fine pieces. <BR/><BR/>Many readers have left smileys in their comments here, and lived to see another day. In fact, the only things balancing out the gravity of the Middle Stage are reader comments and smileys, without which this would be a hopelessly one-dimensional site.Chandrahashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07483080477755487202noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9082470.post-41602532180883800992007-06-30T01:39:00.000+05:302007-06-30T01:39:00.000+05:30I am reading this novel right now and having read ...I am reading this novel right now and having read forty-three absorbing pages, I thought I'd revisit the piece that had first got me interested in the book. Having read a little, I think it might be better if I read it after having finished the book. I don't know why I'm making this comment considering I have nothing of consequence to say apart from the fact that if you wish to read Bellow's novels, the American Center Library might be a good place (am I being obvious?). You won't be able to make notes in the margin though. (I feel like inserting a smiley here but The Middle Stage -- btw, <I>why</I> 'The Middle Stage'? -- has a gravity about it which deters me.)Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11324657686125729569noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9082470.post-1159239821213897742006-09-26T08:33:00.000+05:302006-09-26T08:33:00.000+05:30Molekhi - while I greatly admire your devotion to ...Molekhi - while I greatly admire your devotion to Mr.Bedi's writing, I'm afraid I can't see anything about the excerpt you sent me that resembles either Bellow or Kafka having slept with Solzhenitsyn, as you so charmingly put it. Let us say Mr.Bedi - Mr.Bedi has his own distinctive style, one that belongs to him and to him alone - no Bellow, Kafka or Solzhenitsyn can quite approach it.<BR/><BR/>Shoummo - I haven't read *The Dangling Man*, so I've got nothing to say about it. I hope this will change.Chandrahashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07483080477755487202noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9082470.post-1158968888188412742006-09-23T05:18:00.000+05:302006-09-23T05:18:00.000+05:30I had a comment about Ravelstein in this post (scr...I had a comment about Ravelstein in <A HREF="http://www.chicagoboyz.net/archives/003396.html" REL="nofollow">this post</A> (scroll down).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9082470.post-1158917301628204602006-09-22T14:58:00.000+05:302006-09-22T14:58:00.000+05:30I haven't read anything by Bellow yet but 'Seize T...I haven't read anything by Bellow yet but 'Seize The Day' seems like a good book to begin with--short and interesting.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9082470.post-1158871595787680092006-09-22T02:16:00.000+05:302006-09-22T02:16:00.000+05:30Okay not many read Bellow in India; for that matte...Okay not many read Bellow in India; for that matter, not many actually read or are able to read in India. But the poin here is Bellow fans: Chandrahas, there is a man named Rakesh Bedi in Economic Times who is not only an avid Bellow reader (infact there a few more too) but also writes much in the style of bellow and sometimes a product of Kafka having slept with solzenistin. If you like to read I can quote his contribution to a small stealth blog meant only for a few commandos. Nonetheless, you judge it yourself. He wrote it without effort and with a few typos; but then he was writing in one go (okay there was a quick second read too). will paste it in the next post.<BR/>Bedi's only passion in life is reading (unlike majority of his Punjabi brethren) and drinking (quire like his...) He wont mind dicsussing a point or two with another bellow fan, though I must admit he is a very shy guy.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9082470.post-1158852006676577712006-09-21T20:50:00.000+05:302006-09-21T20:50:00.000+05:30Nice. There's also Coetzee's review of Bellow's ea...Nice. There's also Coetzee's review of Bellow's early novels in the NYRB in 2004:<BR/><BR/>http://www.nybooks.com/articles/17110Falstaffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09791162324919462038noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9082470.post-1158844128984228342006-09-21T18:38:00.000+05:302006-09-21T18:38:00.000+05:30Chandrahas,The USIS library has a collection of Be...Chandrahas,<BR/><BR/>The USIS library has a collection of Bellow. It is just opposite alliance francaise building, Churchgate.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9082470.post-1158784727185462572006-09-21T02:08:00.000+05:302006-09-21T02:08:00.000+05:30Another short novel by Saul Bellow and immensely r...Another short novel by Saul Bellow and immensely readable too is The Dangling man. It expresses the angst of human existence.However, I gave up reading midway,his last novel, Ravelstein. What says thou (plural) about that work.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com